The trick is pure true faith.

I have done experiments with reality.

What I have found is that as long as you truly believe the simulation starts biasing things to align with your beliefs.

I don't know if the gods are real, but if you truly believe that things will move in your favor the probability naturally rises in ways that cannot be proved by pure cause and effect relations as known to normatic sciences.

You have to genuinely believe that the gods favor you. You have to genuinely believe in your good luck. You have to genuinely believe that you are improving.

This won't guarantee shit but it increases the likelihood to an unnatural level.

I have been able to reach 5"9 inches in height just by focusing my internal chi every single night.

There are tricks to get what you want.

It all requires faith and the ability to correctly visualize or sense the data with one of your senses.

Good luck and I hope this helps.

I can confirm it works.

I just got 8 heads out of 10 coin flips twice just by truly believing.

Another trick is to be on a drug or alcohol or other stimulant as it disconnects your brain enough from base every day reality that it is easier to truly believe in what you are doing by focusing your chi or your luck or your faith or whatever.

I hope this helps.

Good luck.

in general at how much people care about this shit "game"

Appearance of a Mountain paca
pic.twitter.com/qaRQMeArfP

— Science girl (@gunsnrosesgirl3) May 13, 2024

!animalposters

https://t.co/P2QRW3gTU7 pic.twitter.com/9oHiTGj7tw

— Rob Romano (@2Aupdates) May 14, 2024

lol, lmao

10 years of Modi's "Make in India".

Chinese manufactured goods makes up 15% of India's total imports. pic.twitter.com/XQ0HSBgDU5

— Zhao DaShuai 东北进修🇨🇳 (@zhao_dashuai) May 10, 2024

Like they are so different it's hard to even imagine them in same room

Steel, aluminum and semiconductor will be big deal since chunks have big part of this market

Because in case of EV you can buy local burger one, obviously for example Tesla for lol will increase the price by 20-40% since there won't be cheaper alternatives but with aluminium regular citizens will pay more

A leading academic no doubt thought she was making polite conversation when she mentioned her fondness of sushi to a Japanese colleague.

However, Nana Sato-Rossberg interpreted the comment as racist, accused Claire Ozanne of prejudice, then sued the School of Oriental and African Studies at the University of London.

Now the judge chairing an employment tribunal has ruled that Sato-Rossberg, a linguistics and culture professor, was “hypersensitive” and “predisposed” to finding fault in her colleague. Jillian Brown dismissed Sato-Rossberg's claim, finding that Ozanne, the former deputy director and provost at Soas, was simply making acceptable and friendly “small talk”.

Earlier the tribunal was told that Sato-Rossberg started teaching at the university in 2014 and five years later was appointed as head of the department for languages, culture and linguistics.

In 2020 Ozanne, an Oxford graduate and insect specialist who has appeared on BBC radio programmes and has since moved to Liverpool Hope University, became her manager.

The tribunal in central London heard that after their first meeting, Sato-Rossberg told a colleague that she thought Ozanne would be biased because Sato-Rossberg “was not British” and was an ethnic minority woman.

The hearing was told that Sato-Rossberg had said that “people like me — a non-white female — must constantly consider the possibility that they are treated unfairly because of gender or ethnicity”.

There was also evidence that in 2021 Ozanne told Sato-Rossberg about a sushi restaurant near her home that her family enjoyed visiting, and that the professor took exception to the comment. Sato-Rossberg told the tribunal that Ozanne “would not have said to a German person, ‘I like sausage.'”

Sato-Rossberg told the hearing that if Ozanne “wished to make conversation, we had many commonalities through our work and professional academic endeavour. But [she] chose to speak only about topics directly relevant to my race: the liking of Japanese food and that her family like it and eat sushi.”

In its report the tribunal said that in the six months following the sushi comment, Sato-Rossberg continued to complain about Ozanne. In 2022 she emailed a senior member of the university's administration accusing the deputy director of bullying and harassment. Sato-Rossberg asked for Ozanne to be replaced as her manager, claiming that she had exhibited “racist microaggression” towards her.

The university started an investigation into the claims, during which time Sato-Rossberg was promoted, but it rejected the allegations last year. In response Sato-Rossberg sued Soas for race discrimination, harassment, victimisation and unfair treatment for whistleblowing.

Rejecting the claim, the judge found that Sato-Rossberg had concluded, without evidence, that Ozanne was prejudiced against her from the start of their relationship.

Addressing the sushi remark, the judge said that Ozanne was aware that Sato-Rossberg was Japanese and took the view that she “would receive this positively. She was making small talk and trying to establish a point of shared interest.”

The judge added that Ozanne had said “nothing detrimental about Japan”.